experiences

Looking for quick answers? Unfortunately, in the world of startups, quick, definite answers rarely exist, but our resources and insights can be a quick reference point.
<a href="/resource-library/">Resource Library</a>

Glossary Of Terms

Industries

interactiveMaps

Contact Us

About

Blog

GROUNDWORK FOR SUCCESS
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit, sed diam nonummy nibh euismod tincidunt ut laoreet dolore

The Team

Insights

Services

projects

<a href="/glossary-of-terms/">Glossary of terms</a>

Resource Library

Home - QuickLaunch

Los Angeles

Washington, D.C.

New York

Dayton

Columbus

Cleveland

Cincinnati

Chicago

Atlanta

There has been a rise in legal claims in which plaintiffs argue that website advertising cookies and pixels should be considered pen registers and/or trap and trace devices, and therefore prohibited under California Penal Code § 638.50-55 (the “California Pen/Trap Law”). However, to date, there is no judicial precedent that supports this position, and these claims appear to be based on a misunderstanding of a recent federal court decision.

core/paragraph

We have published a <a href="https://admin.thompsonhine.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/The-California-Pen-Trap-Law-and-Website-Privacy-Litigation.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">comprehensive analysis</a> describing why the California Pen/Trap Law does not prohibit the use of website advertising cookies and pixels, which focuses on the plain text, structure, and legislative history of the law; previous court orders authorizing the use of pen registers/trap and trace devices; the purpose, scope, and intent of California consumer privacy laws; and the “user consent” provisions in the California Pen/Trap Law. The California Pen/Trap Law is a part of the California Invasion of Privacy Act (CIPA).

California Pen/Trap Law and Website Privacy Litigation